Auen v. Sweeney
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Chief Judge.
In this action against the United States, employees of the Internal Revenue Service, and several unnamed defendants, the pro se plaintiff seeks money damages for alleged violations of constitutional rights. The United States has moved for summary judgment and an award of costs and attorney’s fees.
I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Plaintiff’s pleadings consist mostly of arguments that the income tax is illegal; his pleadings provide little information about the factual basis of his claims. Plaintiff does make clear, however, that the IRS has attempted to…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Posner v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- Hall v. DworkinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- Stewart v. McMickensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Golyar v. McCauslandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
- Fischer v. Samuel Montagu, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.