Webster v. Bartlett Estate Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment denying her petition for a writ of mandate whereby it was sought to compel the defendants to permit the petitioner to inspect and examine the books, records, and journals of defendant corporation. The action was commenced on May 31, 1916, after demand for such inspection and examination, which demand was refused by the defendants. The judgment was entered on the first day of July, 1916, and appeal taken within sixty days thereafter.
On the twenty-fifth day of June, 1907, one share of stock of defendant corporation was issued to appellant, and at all times…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- School District Number Two v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Hobbs v. Tom Reed Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Johnson v. LangdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Royal Consol. Mining Co. v. Royal Consol. Mines (Cal.) Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Hurlburt v. ArthurCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. KaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Mooney v. Bartenders Union Local No. 284California Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. Superior Oil Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1940
- Most v. First National Bank of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Transamerica Corp. v. ParringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.