Schuman v. Ouachita County
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHeorge Rose Smith, J.
Tliis suit, which was decided below on demurrer to the appellant’s complaint, is a sequel to our decision in Sorkin v. Myers, 216 Ark. 908, 227 S. W. 2d 958. The earlier case involved the validity of tax titles to mineral interests that had been severed from the fee. It was there shown that in Ouachita County the taxes upon such mineral interests were not extended upon the same taxbooks that included real property in general. Instead, a separate book of “Leases and Royalties” was kept, in which mineral interests were listed according to the alphabetical order of the owners’ names. We held…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Merwin v. FussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Waters Peirce Oil Co. v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
- Sorkin v. MyersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Greedup v. Franklin CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
- McDaniel v. Texarkana Cooperage & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. CashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Pledger v. Featherlite Precast Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Carwell Elevator Co., Inc. v. LeathersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McIntosh v. Southwestern Truck SalesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Barker v. FrankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.