Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Polk v. Jones

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 6, 2020No. 5:18-cv-00065Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:18-cv-00065-TBR JAMES POLK PLAINTIFF v. ADAM JONES and WILLIAM PROPES DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants Adam Jones and William Propes’ (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. [DN 22.] Plaintiff James Polk, (“Polk”) has responded. [DN 23.] Defendants have replied. [DN 25.] As such, this matter is ripe for adjudication. For the reasons that follow, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [DN 22] is GRANTED. I. Background…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. 16630 Southfield Ltd. Partnership v. Flagstar Bank, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API