Garrett v. Lishawa
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
Under this state of facts w,as there a novation which would relieve the Lishawas from their obligation to Garrett under the contract?
The requisites of a novation are: — a valid, prior obligation to be displaced; the consent of all the parties to the substitution; a sufficient consideration; the extinction of the old obligation, and the creation of a valid new one.
The facts in this case do not meet these requisites. There was a valid prior obligation which was the contract between the appellants and the appellee Garrett. There was no evidence that at any time Garrett consented to the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Bolling v. Clevepak Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
- McGlothin v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Citizens State Bank v. RichartOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- National City Bank v. Reat Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Davlin v. KowalkOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.