Legal Opinion

Garrett v. Lishawa

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1930No. 3569PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Under this state of facts w,as there a novation which would relieve the Lishawas from their obligation to Garrett under the contract?

The requisites of a novation are: — a valid, prior obligation to be displaced; the consent of all the parties to the substitution; a sufficient consideration; the extinction of the old obligation, and the creation of a valid new one.

The facts in this case do not meet these requisites. There was a valid prior obligation which was the contract between the appellants and the appellee Garrett. There was no evidence that at any time Garrett consented to the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bolling v. Clevepak Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. McGlothin v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Citizens State Bank v. RichartOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. National City Bank v. Reat Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Davlin v. KowalkOhio Court of Appeals · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API