Legal Opinion

Brady v. Blair

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 22, 1976No. C-2-75 410PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, District Judge.

Petitioner, a state prisoner when the action was filed, brings this action for a writ of habeas corpus under the provisions of Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241(c)(3).

This matter is before the Court on the petition, return of writ, traverse, transcript of proceedings in State v. David D. Brady, Case Nos. 67445, 67446 and 67449 (Mount Vernon Municipal Court, November, 1972—December, 1973), the briefs and exhibits of the parties, and the evidentiary hearings held on December 19, 1975 and on January 22, 1976.

Petitioner was arrested at 2:35 a. m.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Wesley G. CranerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. WoodsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1978
  4. Philip Landry v. Judge J. Robert Hoepfner and William Guste, Jr., Attorney General, State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. O'BRIENHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API