Legal Opinion

Holman v. Boston Land & Security Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

In September, 1889, the appellees were the owners of a quantity of unthreshed wheat and oats in stack, which they employed the appellant to thresh, and which he undertook to thresh, with a steam thresher then owned and operated by him. While the work of threshing was proceeding, the stacks took fire, and a large portion of the grain was burned. The following are the allegations of the complaint in relation to the damage:

“ That said steam engine and steam threshing machine was defective, faulty and dangerous in construction, and out of repair, and unfit and unsafe for use in threshing grain.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Edwards v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Holman v. Boston Land & Security Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Gibbs v. WallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Denver, Texas & Fort Worth Railroad v. Pulaski Irrigating Ditch Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Denver, Texas & Fort Worth Railroad v. Pulaski Irrigating Ditch Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API