Legal Opinion

Gibbs v. Wall

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1887PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Saguache County. Ti-ie facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Macon, C.

By the uncontradicted testimony in this case, it appears that on the 17th day of May, A. D. 1881, appellees sold appellants five horses for use in a livery-stable, carried on by appellants at that time in the town of Saguache, in this state, and warranted them all to work well, either single or double, except one, as to which they declined to warrant him to work alone, but did warrant that he would work double. On trial of the horses, they were all found to be balky, and, while they would work well at times, they were liable to stop and refuse to go at any time. Two of these horses…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burdsall v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
  2. Thomas v. MackeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1877

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moffatt v. TenneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Empson Packing Co. v. VaughnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  3. Bijou Irrigation District v. Cateran Land & Livestock Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Sargent v. ChapmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Holman v. Boston Land & Security Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API