Legal Opinion

Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Sako

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1994No. Docket 160363, 160375PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, P.J.

Defendants appeal as of right from the trial court’s order that granted summary disposition in favor of plaintiffs. Plaintiffs claimed that defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, the no-fault insurer of defendant Sako’s personal vehicle, was the primary insurer and had a duty to defend in a personal injury lawsuit resulting from defendant Sako’s involvement in an accident with a vehicle rented from plaintiff Enterprise Leasing Company while his own car was being repaired. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

In this case, Enterprise offered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Snappy Car Rental, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Travelers Insurance v. U-Haul of Michigan, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Bowers v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Enterprise Leasing Co. v. SakoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Kaneshiro v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API