Legal Opinion

McLennan v. McLennan

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1925No. Civil No. 2341PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, J .

— On the nineteenth day of December, 1910, the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, a fraternal benefit association, organized under the laws of Ohio, issued a benefit certificate to Robert A. McLennan, hereinafter called the insured. Mary McLennan, the mother of the insured, hereinafter called appellant, was named as beneficiary under the certificate. Under its terms the constitution, rules and regulations of the Brotherhood became a part thereof. Section 62 of the constitution reads as follows:

“Transfer of Beneficiary Certificates.
“Sec. 62. Any member desiring to transfer his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Supreme Conclave v. CappellaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
  2. Modern Woodmen of America v. HeadleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. In re Kelly's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Doss v. KalasArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Schade v. Arizona State Retirement SystemArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Kane v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Franklin Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Julie Ann Mast, Franklin Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Muriel SanduskyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  5. Franklin Life Insurance v. MastDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API