Legal Opinion

Franklin Life Insurance v. Mast

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided June 19, 1968No. Civ. No. 2362-TucPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KILKENNY, District Judge:

The plaintiff interpleads the defendants so that the Court may determine the proper beneficiaries under an insurance policy for $98,950.00, issued on June 4, 1965, to decedent Elizabeth Mast, on an application dated May 11,1965. The face of the policy has been paid into Court. Plaintiff claims no interest in the proceeds, nor a right to designate the beneficiaries. The language of the policy designating the beneficiaries reads: “C. LEE MAST, HUSBAND”, as the primary beneficiary, and “CHILDREN BORN OF THE INSURED’S MARRIAGE TO SAID HUSBAND” as first contingent…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Cook v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Robert C. Sears and Lavonne Stern v. Karen AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Doss v. KalasArizona Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Franklin Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Julie Ann Mast, Franklin Life Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Muriel SanduskyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API