Legal Opinion

Tuckel v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 6, 1934PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

In the late afternoon of December 19th, 1932, the plaintiff slipped and fell upon the sidewalk on the south side of Westbourne Parkway in the city of Hartford, in front of the house known as No. 140, causing her serious injuries. She alleged that the fall was caused by the defective condition of the sidewalk which was covered with ice at that point. Appealing from a judgment for the defendant, she claims the trial court erred in its refusal to incorporate in the finding at least thirty-five paragraphs of her draft-finding, and in support of this, offers various transcripts of evidence. These…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ezzo v. GeremiahSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  2. Aaronson v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Welz v. ManzilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  4. Cunningham, Admx. v. Fair Haven Westville R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  5. Antel v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
  2. Tough v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  3. State v. SwiftSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. Boardman v. BurlingameSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Anderson & McPadden, Inc. v. TunucciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API