Legal Opinion

Claussen v. Brothers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 30, 1928No. 12476PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

This action was brought originally against the Atlantic Coast Tine Railroad Company and George J. Brothers for the alleged wrongful death of W. F. Claussen. On March 21, 1925, the defendant Brothers died, leaving of force a will in which his widow, Mrs. Erwin S. Brothers, was named as executrix. Thereafter a motion was made by the respondents before his Honor, Judge Mauldin, to substitute Mrs. Brothers, as executrix, as party defendant in the place of her deceased husband. Mrs. Brothers resisted the motion on the ground that Tord…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  2. Bennett v. Spartanburg Ry., Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Madden & Co. v. Phoenix Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  4. Osteen v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Devine v. HealyIllinois Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ickes v. BrimhallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Wilson v. MassengillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. McLellan v. Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. Bemis v. WatersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Gowan Ex Rel. Estate of Gowan v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API