Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wilkinson v. Sample

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 15, 1983No. 5149-8-IIIPublished

1DissentMcInturff, J.

(dissenting) — The majority opinion has fashioned an equitable remedy where none exists, was intended, or is allowable under the law. Accordingly, I dissent.

Steven Wilkinson and Joseph Young contracted to purchase Darrell Sample's cleaning business. The purchase price was $30,000. That price was allocated, presumably for tax purposes, as $5,000 for the existing inventory, fixtures and equipment, $10,000 for a 3-year covenant not to compete, and $15,000 for the business' goodwill. At the time of trial, $1,668.50 had been paid toward the goodwill amount.

Wilkinson and Young commenced this action…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Diedrick v. School District No. 81Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. J. I. Case Credit Corp. v. StarkWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hoffer Oil Corporation v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API