Legal Opinion

Lichtenberger v. Central Wisconsin Trust Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

The only question involved in this case is one of law, and consists of whether the separate estate of a married woman is liable for services performed for her in her last sickness, where such services were requested by her husband.

Sec. 313.16 of the Statutes is entitled “Debts; order of payment,” and provides in part as follows:

“(1) If, after the amount of the claims against any estate shall have been ascertained by the court, it shall appear that the executor or administrator has in his possession *338sufficient.to pay ali the debts, he shall pay the same in full within the time limited for that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ryalls v. Mechanics' MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Sullivan v. School District No. 1 of the City of TomahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. Central Vermont Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1908
  4. Schneider v. Estate of BreierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Simons & Son v. ZimmerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Meihost v. MeihostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Grasser v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Truax v. EllettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  4. Estate of FucelaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Vetting v. KefoverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API