Legal Opinion

North Olmsted Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1996No. 95-694PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Northern View, in its first proposition of law, claims that Canitia is not an independent fee appraiser because he (1) represents, almost exclusively, school boards in Cuyahoga County, (2) has not obtained a real estate appraisal certificate from Ohio under R.C. Chapter 4763, (3) improperly collected and verified data for his report, and (4) improperly treated information in preparing his report. We reject these claims.

As to whether Canitia must obtain a certificate as a real estate appraiser before he can testify about his opinion of value, R.C. 4763.13(F) states:

“Nothing in this chapter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Witt Co. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ridgeview Center, Inc. v. Lorain County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. South Euclid/Lyndhurst Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steak 'n Shake, Inc. v. Warren Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. N. Olmsted Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API