Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Howe

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1977No. 75-254PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issues are considered for determination:

1. Did the trial court err in granting a new trial on the issue of negligence ?

2. Is the plaintiff entitled to a new trial in the interests of justice by order of this court pursuant to sec. 251.09, Stats.?

8. Was the defendants’ second motion for judgment on the verdict properly denied ?

Order for New Trial

The plaintiff, Thompson, filed two written motions after verdict. The first motion requested that the court change the jury’s answers finding Thompson causally negligent and rule as a matter of law that the negligence of Howe was the sole…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Leatherman v. GarzaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tombal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Burlison v. JanssenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hoeft v. FriedelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Daniel J. Hartwig Associates, Inc. v. Allan KannerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. State v. LeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Village of Menomonee Falls v. MichelsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API