Legal Opinion
United States v. Malcolm Earl Thomas
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1996No. 95-1102PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Malcolm Earl Thomas appeals his conviction for distribution of crack cocaine, arguing that the district court made three erroneous evidentiary rulings. First, Thomas argues that the district court erred by allowing his co-defendant, Darryl Nicholson, to testify about uncharged drug transactions. Second, Thomas claims that the district court should not have allowed a police officer to testify both as a fact witness and as an expert about the methods and techniques of street level drug dealers. Third, Thomas contends that the district court erred by refusing to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Doris Berry, Personal Representative of the Estate of Lee F. Berry, Jr., Deceased v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/ (99-1003) v. Jack William Tocco, (98-2312/2426)/ Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Kathleen Kremser JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Luis Lopez-MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
- Morales v. American Honda Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.