Legal Opinion

Seagate Technology LLC v. Dalian China Express International Corp.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided August 13, 2001No. C 99-04917 MHPPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PATEL, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Seagate Technology LLC commenced this action following the loss of its international cargo in South San Francisco in November 1998. Now before the court are China Express and U-Freight’s motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment and Seagate’s counter-motions for summary judgment. Having considered the parties’ arguments and submissions, and for the reasons set forth below, the court enters the following memorandum and order.

BACKGROUND

Seagate is a manufacturer of computer disc drives with offices in Scotts Valley, California and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. JW Gaming Development, LLC v. JamesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API