Legal Opinion

Vandegrift v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1912No. 843PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraiser G. A. 7316 (T. D. 32148).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This appeal involves the interpretation of subsection 22 of section 28 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, and of the regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury made under the authority thereof.

Said subsection is as follows: •

Sec. 22. No allowance shall be made in the estimation and liquidation of duties for shortage or nonimportation caused by decay, destruction or injury to fruit or other perishable articles imported into the United States whereby their commercial value has been destroyed, unless under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury. Proof to ascertain such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lawder v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lauricella v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
  3. United States v. HarrisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Harris v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API