Lauricella v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7398 (T. D. 32881), (Abstract 30352 (T. D. 32905).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
This appeal concerns an importation of fruit at the port of New York, claimed to have suffered a shortage or nonimportation by reason of decay or rot, for which reason such part was condemned by the board of health at that port and destroyed. The claim is made under subsection 22 of section 28 of the tariff act of 1909, and overruled by the Board of General Appraisers.
*254That subsection reads:
Seo. 22. No allowance shall be made in the estimation and liquidation of duties for shortage or nonimportation caused by decay, destruction or injury to fruit or other perishable articles imported into the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- United States v. ShallusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Morris European & American Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
- United States v. DominiciCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- United States v. E. L. Goodsell Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Houlder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- United States v. Ricard-Brewster Oil Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
- Consolidated Produce Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- Bayer, Pretzfelder & Mills, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Pan American Commercial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.