Legal Opinion

Lesser v. Lesser

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 26, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This is an action, brought in 1945 by the widow of Joseph Lesser as the record owner of the property in question, to declare a mortgage of record invalid under General Statutes, § 5038, and, in a second count, a gift and not an enforceable obligation, and for “such other and further relief as' to equity and law may pertain.” The defendant sought foreclosure of the mortgage by cross-compláint. The plaintiff answered that the right to foreclose had been lost by laches. The finding may be summarized as follows: Sarah Lesser became a widow in 1919 and never remarried. She had sev eral children,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Richards v. MacKallSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Dawson v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
  3. House v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Tracy v. WheelerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Lomas & Nettleton Co. v. IsacsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. BletschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Cendant Corp. v. SheltonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
  4. Ghent v. Meadowhaven Condominium, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Jacobs v. FazzanoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API