Legal Opinion

Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Tillman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1889No. Civil No. 259PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Pinal. William W. Porter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

This was a bill to quiet title by the plaintiff against defendants in possession. Plaintiff claims through a deed from the sheriff under a judicial sale for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The sheriff ’s deed, is of date July 3, 1884. The lot sued for had been part of the public domain until April, 1883, when the probate judge made a deed to defendant Tillman, who, at the time, was an occupant of the premises, .and had been from February, 1882, and has been ever since and is now an occupant with his co-tenant, Weeden. Under the act of Congress of March 2, 1867, for the relief of citizens of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  2. Jackson Ex Dem. Bradstreet v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. Alexander and Other v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  4. Cannon v. StockmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Winfield Town Co. v. MarisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. HoffArizona Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Capener v. Tanadgusix Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Silverstone v. HanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Johnson v. Pacific Coast S. S. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1904
  5. Johnston v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API