Legal Opinion
Fox v. Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 28, 1982No. Civ. A. 75-445PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Defendant Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) moves for a stay pending appeal of this Court’s Order of November 18, 1981, that HUD shall, among other things, make Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) funds available for the financing of a development project to be built in compliance with a consent decree approved by this Court.
After I entered the Order of November 18, 1981, HUD moved to amend the judgment, arguing for the first time that the anti-injunction language contained in 12 U.S.C. § 1723a(a) bars this Court from ordering…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hamilton v. RathboneSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. Egidio Cerilli, in No. 78-2105. Maylan Yackovich, in No. 78-2106. John Shurina, in No. 78-2107. Ralph Buffone, in No. 78-2439Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Mel's Lockers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fox v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Fox v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Orrego v. US DEPT. OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEV.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Orrego v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- West Pointe Ltd. Partnership v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (In re Lamplite Ltd. Partnership)District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990