Legal Opinion
Fox v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 1, 1982No. Nos. 82-1039, 82-1063PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
Alternatively interpreting and modifying a consent decree, the district court ordered the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to set aside approximately $11 million in Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) tandem financing at an interest rate of 7.5% to finance rehabilitation of 111 units and construction of 20 units of subsidized rental housing in the Washington Square area of Philadelphia. 532 F.Supp. 540. The Secretary has appealed, contending that the language of the consent decree does not support the court’s interpretation,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- System Federation No. 91 v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gary South v. Charles RoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Board of Education of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Elizabethtown, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1988
- Fox v. United States Department Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.