Legal Opinion
Rozier v. Perales
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel compliance with the respondent State Commissioner’s "Decision After Fair Hearing” dated December 13, 1985, the petitioner appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, *711J.), entered May 5, 1987, as denied her application for attorney’s fees.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The court properly rejected the petitioner’s contention that she was entitled to an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Patterson v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Williams v. D'EliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Middleton v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Kross v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Axelrod v. GrinkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rashid v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Thomasel v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.