Legal Opinion
Middleton v. Perales
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondent Commissioner of the New York City Department of Social Services to comply with the respondent State Commissioner’s "Decision After Fair Hearing” dated December 29, 1987, the State Commissioner appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaccaro, J.), dated May 16, 1988, as granted that branch of the petitioner’s application which was for an award of attorney’s fees assessed against the appellant, and is in favor of the petitioner and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rozier v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Patterson v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Williams v. D'EliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walker v. New York CityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Ferraro v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Thomasel v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Cuevas v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Varsalona v. PeralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.