Legal Opinion
Ralph Charles Roeth v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 30, 1969No. 27542_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Roeth brings this appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside the sentence imposed on him for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. We affirm. 1
On March 15, 1965,. Roeth entered a plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas to the charge of having knowingly transported a stolen motor vehicle from Louisiana to California. The case had been transferred to the district court in Texas from the Southern District of California pursuant to Rule 20, F.R.Crim.P. In his current § 2255 effort Roeth…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Parker v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ralph C. Roeth v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Joseph Roy Mason Nanney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Thomas Jefferson Shores v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
3Cited by2 opinions
- Howard Lee White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Aaron Lawrence Farr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972