Legal Opinion

Ralph C. Roeth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1967No. 24278_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

On March 15, 1965, pursuant to Rule 20 Fed.R.Crim.P., appellant was arraigned in Texas on a California indictment charging him with a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. At that time he was informed of his right to counsel, waived such assistance, and pleaded guilty. Thereafter, on March 26, 1965, he was arraigned on a Texas information charging him with another Dyer Act violation. Again, he waived his right to counsel and pleaded guilty. Approximately two months later, on May 28, 1965, after a classification study, appellant was given five and three year sentences to run…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Volney Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
  3. O. B. Ellis, General Manager, Texas Prison System, and State of Texas v. Merle Wayne EllisorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jose Verdugo and Horace Eugene Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. John Albert BakewellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Robert Dale ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. Thomas Kee Ming HsuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Ricardo Perez RuizCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API