Legal Opinion

Danhof v. Osborne

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 17, 1956No. Gen. 10,901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Crow

This is a suit under the Dram Shop Act, ch. 43, Ill. Rev. Stats. 1953, par. 135, for loss of means of support by May Danhof, wife of Cornelius P. Danhof, sometimes known as “Pelie” Danhof, against the defendants as owners and proprietors of two taverns in which she alleges her husband was sold or given alcoholic liquor and thereby became intoxicated. The action is for alleged injury in her means of support resulting “in consequence- of the intoxication” of her husband. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff of $10,000. Judgment was entered thereon. The defendants appeal, after denial…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lindroth v. Walgreen Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Neering v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Blumb v. GetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Phillabaum v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Schroder v. CrawfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1880

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Danhof v. OsborneIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Cardona v. ToczydlowskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  3. E. A. Meyer Constr. Co. v. DrobnickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. James v. Checker Taxi Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  5. Collister v. Allen E. Kroblin, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API