Legal Opinion

Parkash v. New York City Water Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

*291Respondent’s determination was neither arbitrary, capricious, nor a violation of law (see Haav 575 Realty Corp. v New York City Water Bd., 38 AD3d 481 [2007]). To the extent that the decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Matter of Pistilli Assoc. III, LLC v New York City Water Bd. (46 AD3d 905 [2007]) calls for a different result, we disagree. Concur— Andrias, J.E, Saxe, Sweeny, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pistilli Associates III, LLC v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Haav 575 Realty Corp. v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007