Legal Opinion

State v. Rousten

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 27, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

1. The statute makes it a punishable offense for any person wantonly and maliciously to “prevent an electric meter from duly registering the quantity of electricity supplied, or cause it to be done.” P. L., c. 355, s. 7.

The state’s evidence tended to prove the following facts: In 1921 the defendant established a bakery business in Manchester under the name of the Nu-Fashion Bakery. He was the owner of the building and the sole proprietor of the business. During that same year electric meters were installed in his building. His trade name was entered on the books of the electric company, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. CruikshankSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HickenbottomWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. InselburgSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. State v. FennellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. State v. TherrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API