Legal Opinion

Reithmiller v. Carr

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1939No. 30612PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnsen, j.

The heirs at law of Warren B. Ellis, deceased, seek by this action to have it declared that the twenty-fifth paragraph of his will is violative of the rule against perpetuities, and that they are accordingly entitled to the residuary estate which it creates. They claim further that, if the *285rule against perpetuities is not violated, they are still entitled to the residuary estate as a matter of renunciation or defeasance, because the beneficiary has failed to comply with the condition of the will within a reasonable time.

The principal defendants — and the only ones material so far…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. St. James Orphan Asylum v. ShelbyNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Merrill v. PardunNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Allebach v. City of FriendNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Secrest v. RoperNebraska Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Valley Savings Bank v. Penn CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Hills v. D'AmoursSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API