Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Port Arthur

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 1973No. 7434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIES, Chief Justice.

The City of Port Arthur, a home rule city, brought suit against Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for a declaratory judgment that its Ordinance No. 71-92, adopted November 11, 1971, is valid. From a summary judgment in favor of City, Telephone Company perfects this appeal.

Both parties stipulate that “the only issues in this lawsuit involving Ordinance No. 71-92 . . . pertain solely to the interpretation and validity of Section 4 thereof. The validity and interpretation of the remaining sections of such Ordinance No. 71-92 are not involved in this lawsuit, or presented to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Schenker v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. Texas Power & Light Company v. City of GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. Northwestern Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. City of Jacksonville v. GENERAL TEL. CO., ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  3. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1977
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API