Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of Port Arthur
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DIES, Chief Justice.
The City of Port Arthur, a home rule city, brought suit against Southwestern Bell Telephone Company for a declaratory judgment that its Ordinance No. 71-92, adopted November 11, 1971, is valid. From a summary judgment in favor of City, Telephone Company perfects this appeal.
Both parties stipulate that “the only issues in this lawsuit involving Ordinance No. 71-92 . . . pertain solely to the interpretation and validity of Section 4 thereof. The validity and interpretation of the remaining sections of such Ordinance No. 71-92 are not involved in this lawsuit, or presented to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Schenker v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Texas Power & Light Company v. City of GarlandTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. Northwestern Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fort Worth Independent School District v. City of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Jacksonville v. GENERAL TEL. CO., ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1977
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1977