Cole v. Towers Perrin Forster & Crosby
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL [Dkt. # 24]
THOMAS P. SMITH, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is an age and disability discrimination action arising out of plaintiffs termination of employment with defendant as a consultant in its Health and Welfare Consulting Unit. Prior to working in this unit, plaintiff had been employed by defendant for seven years. (Complaint). Pending before the court is plaintiffs motion to compel responses to interrogatories and production requests. (Dkt.# 24). As set forth below, plaintiffs motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
Standard of Review
Parties…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Culkin v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
3Cited by66 opinions
- A. Mark Getachew and Denora Getachew v. L&S Investments, LLC, Lawrence Rutkowski, and Eric D. GraysonDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Alberty v. HunterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Antoinette C. Taylor v. Phyllis A. FrazierDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Antoinette C. Taylor v. Phyllis A. FrazierDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Arvinas Operations, Inc. v. QianDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.