Legal Opinion

Watson v. Dailey

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1983No. 83-50PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The substantive issue presented by this appeal is whether beneficiaries of a codicil to the decedent’s will who served as subscribing witnesses to the codicil are entitled to receive the bequests made to them by the codicil. There is a secondary jurisdictional issue premised upon an untimely filing of a proper notice of appeal as required by Rule 2.01, W.R.A.P. The district court held that the bequests to the beneficiaries who also were subscribing witnesses are of no effect and are void. We have concluded that this court does have jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DS v. Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. RidenourWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Yeager v. YeagerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Merritt v. MerrittWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Estate of CampbellWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API