GOLMEZ v. Clark Equipment Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MANFORD, Judge.
Appellant (plaintiff) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of respondent (defendant) on appellant’s claim for damages under a theory of product liability. The judgment is affirmed.
Appellant raises four points on appeal and charges that the trial court erred (1) in excluding certain opinion testimony; (2) in overruling appellant’s objection to the interjection, by respondent, of the issue of appellant’s Workers’ Compensation claim; (3) in barring appellant’s expert witness from testifying as to the issue of foreseeability; and (4) in instructing the jury on contributory…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Duke v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Dean Hales v. Green Colonial, Inc., a Corporation v. Harold Munroe, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Vanskike v. ACF Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Swindler v. Butler Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
3Cited by13 opinions
- Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Sutherland v. Elpower Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,848 Dennis Belec v. Hayssen Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Jennifer Jones v. Ryobi, Ltd A.B. Dick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Carlisto v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.