Legal Opinion

GOLMEZ v. Clark Equipment Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1987No. WD 39110PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

Appellant (plaintiff) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of respondent (defendant) on appellant’s claim for damages under a theory of product liability. The judgment is affirmed.

Appellant raises four points on appeal and charges that the trial court erred (1) in excluding certain opinion testimony; (2) in overruling appellant’s objection to the interjection, by respondent, of the issue of appellant’s Workers’ Compensation claim; (3) in barring appellant’s expert witness from testifying as to the issue of foreseeability; and (4) in instructing the jury on contributory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Duke v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Dean Hales v. Green Colonial, Inc., a Corporation v. Harold Munroe, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Vanskike v. ACF Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Swindler v. Butler Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Nissei ASB MacH. Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Sutherland v. Elpower Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,848 Dennis Belec v. Hayssen Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Jennifer Jones v. Ryobi, Ltd A.B. Dick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Carlisto v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API