Legal Opinion

County of Westchester v. Mahoney

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 13, 1982PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, the petition to stay arbitration granted and the cross petition to compel arbitration dismissed. Our reading of the collective bargaining agreement as a whole establishes the parties’ plain and unambiguous intent to limit the right to demand step 3 grievance arbitration to the college and the union. Accordingly, respondent faculty member’s arbitration demand was without legal effect (cf. Matter of Horseheads Cent. School Dist.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Arbitration between Horseheads Central School District & Horseheads Teachers' Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. HankinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. J. D. Structures, Inc. v. WaldbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Mahoney v. HankinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Town of New Castle v. L'EplattenierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Matter of Widrick (Carpinelli)New York Court of Appeals · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API