Legal Opinion

Wininger v. SI Management L.P.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2007No. Nos. 05-16107, 06-15301Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

In these consolidated cases, we consider whether the district court properly awarded attorneys’ fees to counsel for both the class representatives (“Plaintiffs’ counsel”) and objectors (“Objectors’ counsel”), following the settlement of the underlying class action litigation. Because the parties are familiar with the history of this case, we will not recount it here.

I

The objectors appeal the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees to Plaintiffs’ counsel, arguing that the mandate pronounced by a prior panel of this court, Wininger v. SI Management L.P. (“Wininger I”), 301 F.3d…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Gary Paul Cassett v. Terry L. Stewart, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API