Alexandria Associates, Ltd. v. Mitchell Co.
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, Chief Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs have responded to the Motion. The Court, having considered the Motion and response, along with memoranda of authorities and attachments thereto, is of the opinion that Defendants’ Motion is well taken and should be granted.
1. Facts and Procedural History
This action arises out of Plaintiffs’ purchase of partnership interests from Defendants. Plaintiff Alexandria Associates, Ltd. (“Alexandria”), a limited partnership, and Plaintiff Anthony J. LaSala (“LaSala”),…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alexandria Associates, Ltd. v. Mitchell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Alexandria Associates, Ltd. v. Mitchell Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993