Legal Opinion

Radeker v. . Royal Pines Park, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 10, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee CuRiam.

Tbe judge of tbe general county court of Buncombe, “after bearing evidence for plaintiff and movants, and .argument of counsel,” found tbe facts, and upon tbe facts so found held, “in its discretion and as a matter of law, . . . that tbe movants have shown excusable neglect and a meritorious defense,” and adjudged that tbe default judgment and tbe proceedings pursuant thereto', be “declared null and void and set aside.”

No evidence appears in tbe case on appeal, unless tbe pleadings, tbe judgment sought to be set aside and tbe record incident thereto, and tbe motion and affidavit of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants Bank v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Weil v. . WoodardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Housing Authority of City of Charlotte.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Hughes v. OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. In Re Discharge of Burris Ex Rel. City ManagerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Hughes v. . OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API