Legal Opinion

Weed & Bro. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 3, 1930No. F-406PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Judge.

Plaintiff in this suit seeks to recover the sum of $24,442.67, an alleged overpayment' of its income and excess profits tax for the-year 1919. Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under and by* virtue of the laws of the state of New York, with its principal place of business at No. 60-62 Lispenard street, in the city of New York,

During the year 1919, and for several 'years prior thereto, plaintiff was engaged in the business of buying raw or unbleached cotton goods, which it caused to be dyed, bleached, and printed for the purposes of sale to the manufacturing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. LaBelle Iron Works v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. United States v. RindskopfSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
  5. United States v. Philadelphia Knitting Mills Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Automobile Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. American Automobile Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API