Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Automobile Assn. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 9, 1961No. 288Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Stewart, whom Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Whittaker join, dissenting.

In Automobile Club of Michigan the Court pointed out that the method of accounting employed by the taxpayer was “purely artificial,” so far as the record there showed. 353 U. S., at 189. Here, by contrast, the petitioner proved, and the Court of Claims found, that the method of accounting employed by the petitioner during the years in issue was in accord with generally accepted commercial accounting principles and practice, was customarily employed by similar taxpayers, and, in the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. North American Oil Consolidated v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API