Legal Opinion

Johnson v. McCrackin-Sturman Ford, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 23, 1974No. C.A. 73-458PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN PART

WILLSON, Senior District Judge.

This action was begun by William and Joan Johnson to recover statutory damages from McCrackin-Sturman Ford and Ford Motor Credit Company for allegedly inadequate credit disclosures in violation of the Truth-In-Lending Act, 15 U. S.C. § 1601 et seq., and Federal Reserve Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. 226, made in the course of financing the automobile which the plaintiffs purchased from defendant McCrackin-Sturman and which financing was later assigned to defendant, Ford Motor Credit. Jurisdiction is conferred by 15…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garza v. Chicago Health Clubs, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. William Johnson and Joan Johnson, His Wife, and Cross-Appellees v. McCrackin Ford, Inc., and Ford Motor Credit Company, Inc., and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  2. James L. Martin v. Commercial Securities Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Meyers v. Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974
  4. Woods v. Beneficial Finance Co. of EugeneDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1975
  5. Simmons v. American Budget Plan, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API