Legal Opinion

Carstens Packing Co. v. Miller

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1935No. Civ. 9251PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for damages resulting from an alleged breach of contract to purchase 138,000 pounds of hog hair. The contract was in the form of correspondence between plaintiff, operator of packing houses at Tacoma and Seattle, and defendant, a processor at Los Angeles of curled hair. This correspondence was initiated by defendant personally in February, 1929, and concluded by R. S. Braun, an employee of defendant, in June of the same year.

Appellant’s first contention is that he did not authorize or have knowledge of Braun’s purchase of the goods and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norris v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Producers Fruit Co. v. GoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. More v. BonnetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Henry Cowell Lime & Co. v. Santa Cruz County National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Platt v. Union Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Samuels v. L. A. Mattress Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API