Legal Opinion

United States v. Eidum

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 1973No. 72-2286PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONTI, District Judge:

Kenneth W. Eidum pleaded guilty to violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (Interstate Transportation of a Stolen Motor Vehicle). The trial judge sentenced him to three years. Eidum moved for modification of sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which motion was denied. He appeals to this court from that denial.

This court has held that when:

“There is a reasonable probability that the defective prior convictions may have led the trial court to impose a heavier sentence than it otherwise would have imposed . . . we are unable to conclude that the reception of such evidence was harmless…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Forrest S. Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Bill Harvey Dukes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Gil Munoz Leano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. Madison Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API