Legal Opinion
Madison Wilson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 22, 1976No. 74-1124PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge.
*131The judgment of the district court in denying the motion to vacate and set aside the judgment and commitment dated February 19, 1962, is affirmed. We find that the requirement of United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443, 92 S.Ct. 589, 30 L.Ed.2d 592 (1972) has been met in this case by the district judge’s reconsideration of the earlier sentence. See United States v. Eidum, 474 F.2d 581 (9 Cir. 1973). Tucker does not require resentencing, but rather, mandates that prior sentences be reconsidered. This has been done in the present case. We find no basis in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Robert Edward Lipscomb v. J. J. Clark, Warden, U. S. Penitentiary, United States of America v. Robert E. LipscombCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Edward Eugene Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- Forrest S. Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Robert A. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Cardova Lawary v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Ronald Kainalu ChingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. William Edward EatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.