Corn Exchange Bank v. Miller
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
This is a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, on the grounds mainly that upon its face it is shown that plaintiff has no interest, right, or title to the properties specified in the bill, money and property that is now in the possession or under the control of the defendants as Alien Property Custodian and Treasurer of the United States, pursuant to its seizure during the World War, and generally that the allegations are insufficient to constitute a cause of action under section 9 (a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended by 41 Stat. 977, and 42 Stat. 1511…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Behn, Meyer & Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Munich Reinsurance Co. v. First Reinsurance Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Miller v. HerzfeldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- United States v. Securities Corp. GeneralCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925