Legal Opinion
Chiango v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 22, 1978No. Appeal, No. 1870 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Menoer,
Anthony Chiango (claimant) has taken this appeal from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) affirming the referee’s denial of benefits under Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Act), Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P.S. §802(e) (willful misconduct connected with his work). We affirm.
Prior to May 16, 1975, claimant was employed by United Parcel Service (UPS). UPS had a rule, *612known to the claimant, requiring an employee who was going to be absent to call in prior to his starting time.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. BaconCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Curtis v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Ralston v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Simpson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Roebuck v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fisher v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Azar v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Williams v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Lincoln v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Lingenfelter v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981