Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 1, 1997No. Nos. 2989 and 3003 C.D. 1996PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) properly determined that Calvin R. Fisher and Anthony J. Kaydo (Claimants) were not entitled to a remand hearing to show that they had received vacation monies that they claim should have been included in their base year.

Claimants appealed the orders of the Board that affirmed the decisions of the referee that Claimants were ineligible for benefits under Section 404 of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law).1 We reverse and remand.

Both Claimants were employed for over…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cugini v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Flores v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Coates v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Chiango v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. USX Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Procito v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Kiehl v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Skowronek v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. A. Nabay v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  5. A. Zuraski, III v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API